
Lawyers for the Speaker of Parliament have called for Supreme Court Judge, Justice Gaewu to recuse himself from the case in relation to the Speaker’s declaration of some seats vacant.
The Supreme Court on Wednesday, October 30 began hearing a suit filed by Speaker Bagbin for the Apex Court to vacate its ruling of a stay of execution on the Speaker’s declaration.
Thaddeus Sory in court on Wednesday, October 30 argued that the said Justice had once affiliated with the NPP by contesting as an MP on the ticket of the party in the Volta Region, thus cannot be a Judge in the case.
“He was known to be associated with the New Patriotic Party (NPP) and he was a parliamentary candidate in one of their constituencies in the Volta Region,” Thaddeus Sory argued.
It would be recalled that following an ex parte motion filed by Alexander Afenyo-Markin over the declaration of vacant seats by Bagbin, the apex court ordered a stay of ruling on Bagbin’s declaration.
In response, Bagbin applied to the apex court through his lawyer, Thaddeus Sory. The Speaker contends that the Supreme Court misapplied the law by putting on hold the execution of his ruling because it was a non-judicial decision.
The Speaker in his relief prayed the court to strike out its stay of execution of his ruling on the declaration of the four seats vacant, among others.
The Speaker is further seeking an order from the court to set aside the writ filed by the Leader of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) caucus, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, which sought to prevent the Speaker from making any ruling on the four seats.
According to the Speaker, the Supreme Court had powers to put on hold the rulings of courts and not those of non-judicial bodies such as Parliament.
“In terms of orders staying of execution of rulings, the Supreme Court’s powers, under the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana and statute, to stay execution of rulings are limited to rulings of itself and courts lower in the judicial hierarchy but do not extend to a ruling of the Speaker of Parliament who is not part of the judicial hierarchy,” the motion stated.
“With regard to the first defendant’s rulings in Parliament, a separate arm of Government, therefore, such rulings are not rulings within the judicial hierarchy to be the subject matter of ‘an application for stay of execution’ and a judicial order staying their execution,” it added.
Watch the live streaming of the court proceedings below: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/bGoa78aUPQsGXLdB/
Click on the link to join the OnlineTimesGH News channel for curated, meaningful stories tailored just for YOU:https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VajF89Q6WaKprDT5mu2V