Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, the Member of Parliament for North Tongu, has strongly criticized the Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ) over its controversial conclusion regarding a financial transaction between the National Cathedral Secretariat and JNS Talent Centre, a company linked to Rev. Kusi Boateng, also known as Kwabena Adu Gyamfi.
Background:
- GH¢2.6 Million Payment Controversy:
Ablakwa raised concerns over a GH¢2.6 million payment made by the National Cathedral Secretariat to JNS Talent Centre, which he claimed was linked to Rev. Kusi Boateng. Ablakwa had petitioned CHRAJ, alleging that this transaction involved a conflict of interest. - CHRAJ’s Findings:
Despite these concerns, CHRAJ concluded that there was no conflict of interest in the matter. The Commission suggested that the payment was a reimbursement to Boateng for funds he advanced to contractors during financial difficulties faced by the Secretariat. Additionally, CHRAJ recommended a forensic audit of the National Cathedral project and possible prosecution of its trustees for alleged corruption and abuse of power.
Ablakwa’s Criticism:
- Rejection of CHRAJ’s Ruling:
Ablakwa termed CHRAJ’s ruling as “bizarre” and questioned the rationale behind its conclusion, particularly regarding the lack of supporting records.“Despite the shocking levels and the lack of records, CHRAJ still manages to conclude that there is no conflict of interest,” Ablakwa said, further noting that the only document provided by Boateng was produced after the money had been released.
- Concerns About Credibility:
Ablakwa expressed doubts about CHRAJ’s credibility in making such a decision, pointing out the strange timing and questionable documentation of the transaction.“I find that really bizarre and I don’t see how CHRAJ really held its credibility to come to this conclusion,” he added during an interview on Eyewitness News on November 25, 2024.
Next Steps:
- Forensic Audit:
While CHRAJ has called for a forensic audit into the National Cathedral project, Ablakwa’s concerns underscore a continued push for accountability and further scrutiny of the controversial dealings surrounding the project. - Possible Legal Action:
CHRAJ also hinted at the potential for prosecution of National Cathedral trustees, but this remains to be seen as investigations continue.
Ablakwa’s rejection of CHRAJ’s findings suggests ongoing tensions and concerns regarding transparency and financial accountability within the National Cathedral project.
